The following Investigative Case Study is a Great Example of why Canadian Public investigations are desperately needed in order for the Canadian People to be treated fairly by the Banks, Equifax and their appointed Lawyers.
In the following Canadian Public Investigative Case Study Stephen Schwartz is the Lawyer for Equifax (The Defendant) .
In this case the Canadian (The Plaintiff) is the one who sued Equifax.
The Canadian sued Equifax due to completing an unreasonable insufficient investigation regarding inaccurate information appearing on their Credit Report.
To fully understand how Equifax is misrepresenting their service to the Canadian People click the following link:
The Following Is A Public Investigation Regarding:
When a Canadian sues Equifax Canada , does Equifax appointed Lawyers allow the Canadian Public their Due Process (treat them fairly)?
The following case study featuring Stephen Schwartz will clearly illustrate the answer to the above question is a very obvious NO!
In this case the Canadian sued Equifax due to an unreasonable insufficient Investigation process concerning inaccurate information appearing on their Credit Report.
As you will see Stephen Schwartz refuses to answer any of the reasonable questions The Canadian Borrower / Plaintiff is asking.
Stephen Schwartz is demonstrating the classic move all unfair Lawyers use when their ONLY Defense is to ignore pertinent questions while taking away The Canadians Plaintiffs Due Process.
The following is a link to an email The Canadian Plaintiff sent Stephen Schwartz (the Lawyer) containing very reasonable questions:
As you can see the above email had very pertinent and reasonable questions when answered will determine if in fact Equifax completed a reasonable sufficient investigation.
This is why Stephen Schwartz refuses to answer the provided reasonable questions in the above Email Link.
Stephen Schwartz did respond but still refuses to answer any of the reasonable pertinent questions set out within the above Email Link!
Stephen Schwartz response was to read the information he has provided.
What he is referring to is a case printed off from the internet that as we can see has nothing to do with the circumstances surrounding this case therefore we sent the following email:
Stephen Schwartz did not respond to the above email therefore The Canadian Plaintiff sent the following Email:
We managed to get a response from Stephen Schwartz weeks after but as you can see we had to inform him that we were contemplating going public considering the poor manner in which Stephen Schwartz is conducting this file. The following is Stephen Schwartz email response:
As you can see he still refuses to answer the questions therefore the Canadian Plaintiff sent the following email:
This is where YOU, The Canadian Public can make a difference concerning the unfair treatment of The Canadian Public by Equifax and the Banks appointed Lawyers .
This is the time to react by sending Stephen Schwartz an Email making him aware that the Canadian Public is watching.
Let Us Help You Take Action Consistently .
Sign up for our FREE Automated Complaint System. This will allow you to send 1 complaint a month to each Bank Employee, Collector or Lawyer Bullying Canadians with no effort or cost on your part.
Knowledge Without Action Is Useless…
Be Part Of The Solution !
Contact Us: 1-877-370-3883